Jump to content

An Announcement from the Fenris Coalition


SirWilliam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can't tell if you guys are really sour about that trade circle business.

Sorry, what was that? you need to speak up sonny boy, no one can hear you when you mumble.

 

Cheering for SUN on this one, i have no idea who they are though.

The Forgotten Ones thank you for your support from the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"But we are vaginas, so we waited until a global war."

Rock indeed.

NpO is one of the worst offenders in excessive treaty signings that lead to wars only being able to happen in a global war setting. Then you blame them for waiting until a global war. :facepalm:

You're just mad that we're smart enough to come together and attack Polarsphere for all the grievances we have against you at once, rather than come at you one by one and be crushed by your little hegemony you thought you had going on. The majority is smart, the majority has spoken. Deal with it, Schatt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"But we are vaginas, so we waited until a global war."

Rock indeed.

 

Oh Schatt, as though the when and the why and the what of it ever mattered. It is hard on the eyes to see that ridiculous AA on your nation though. I suppose it's true; we either die or live long enough to become what we despise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The State of Unified Nations recoginzes a state of war with Kashmir and The JavahouseLeague.  Unlike the first attack against our peaceful alliance, at least this attack serves a obvious purpose to benefit the attacking alliances, and SUN fully expects the ending terms of this war to finally settle important questions for our future on the Yellow team together such as: 
  1. Is it acceptable to message member nations of other Yellow alliances with offers of trade circle management without permission of the sovereign government of the alliance being messaged?
  2. What are minimal standards for Yellow team alliances in regard to the use of sanctions during times of war?
 
If we, through the course of war, we can resolve these issues, then we have a chance for peaceful coexistence on Yellow in the future.

 

 

i dont think there can be peace if you intend to threaten us over messaging nations for trade circles and lift sanctions off of rogues behind the curtain of anonymity.

 

this is the result of your actions, our views have been expressed.

 

Sorry, what was that? you need to speak up sonny boy, no one can hear you when you mumble.

 

man he typed that.

 

"But we are vaginas, so we waited until a global war."

Rock indeed.

 

im not sure that a war over trade circle messaging would have been greeted with open arms by anyone.  then this nonsense about the sanction being lifted off a rogue recently without anyone having the sack to say who did it happened and here we are, ready to teach some people some manners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that an iPod classic? Shoot, we're goin way back.

Been a lucrative war so far for kashmir, enjoyed the blitz and almost 50% of SUN in anarchy. Jeesh we haven't even shot any nukes yet!

Maybe NS numbers are irrelevant to alliance power and efficiency.


Pretty much!

A well organised blitz and quad can anarchy most people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The State of Unified Nations recoginzes a state of war with Kashmir and The JavahouseLeague.  Unlike the first attack against our peaceful alliance, at least this attack serves a obvious purpose to benefit the attacking alliances, and SUN fully expects the ending terms of this war to finally settle important questions for our future on the Yellow team together such as: 

 

  1. Is it acceptable to message member nations of other Yellow alliances with offers of trade circle management without permission of the sovereign government of the alliance being messaged?
  2. What are minimal standards for Yellow team alliances in regard to the use of sanctions during times of war?
 
If we, through the course of war, we can resolve these issues, then we have a chance for peaceful coexistence on Yellow in the future.

 

 

Since we're rhetoricalizing, let's not fail to add:

 

3. What are minimal standards for Yellow team alliances in regard to the lifting of sanctions?

4. What are minimal (and, perhaps, even reasonable) standards for Yellow team alliances in the answering of Senators' questions by other Senators?

 

I'd say the first two are about as likely to get resolved through the course of war as the last two.

 

And if that's the way we as Yellow talk, then by gum that's the way we as Yellow will walk.  We're chill dudes but if unity entails hegemony then forget it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh Schatt, as though the when and the why and the what of it ever mattered...

 

You're just mad that we're smart enough to come together and attack Polarsphere for all the grievances we have against you at once, rather than come at you one by one and be crushed by your little hegemony you thought you had going on. The majority is smart, the majority has spoken. Deal with it, Schatt.

 

Help me out here...  :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...