Jackdog15 Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 So, i was thinking the other day about how boring CN is. Its just an endless cycle of build, fight, died, repeat for alliances. This lead me to think about what would make the game more interesting again. I came to the conclusion that what cyber nations needs in some chaos. By that i mean some kind of mass uprising of some sort. Like of a ton of small nations/alliances all attacked a big alliance. Or if civil wars broke out in a ton of major alliances. Or an off site force came and declared war on everyone. So basically my question is would you want something like this to happen? Also why hasn't anything like this ever happened before (and worked)? Before you guys hate on me I want to make it clear that I don't have any plans to do something like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 Iam an agent of chaos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 (edited) So, i was thinking the other day about how boring CN is. Its just an endless cycle of build, fight, died, repeat for alliances. This lead me to think about what would make the game more interesting again. I came to the conclusion that what cyber nations needs in some chaos. By that i mean some kind of mass uprising of some sort. Like of a ton of small nations/alliances all attacked a big alliance. Or if civil wars broke out in a ton of major alliances. Or an off site force came and declared war on everyone. So basically my question is would you want something like this to happen? Also why hasn't anything like this ever happened before (and worked)? Before you guys hate on me I want to make it clear that I don't have any plans to do something like this. Holy shit! Another idiot with another grand plan about what CN needs!! I've heard this same shit way too many times. I can only imagine how senior players who have.played consistently feel.... Wanna know why it hasn't happened before? Buckaroo13 and Tom Riddle are perfect examples. It doesn't work because a small AA hitting a big one is absolutely suicidal in every imaginable way (unless said larger alliance is MI6) Not to mention that small nations and large nations are equally dependent on each other. I hope that some day, people will stop regurgitating this same bullshit for everyone's sake. Edited October 25, 2014 by Fox Fire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 Don't listen to the naysayers. It's exactly what Pansy wants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pansy Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 I put this down years ago, it is counter productive to my land collecting.... small nations thinking they can fight back... pfft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 Don't listen to the naysayers. It's exactly what Pansy wants. And you better not deny Pansy.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 I put this down years ago, it is counter productive to my land collecting.... small nations thinking they can fight back... pfftThe end of the Pansy Age draws near. I for one will be ready to rise up, and am ready to wage a war of assassins, insurgents, and shadow warriors against your cruel oppression.Who will stand with me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pansy Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 (edited) The end of the Pansy Age draws near. I for one will be ready to rise up, and am ready to wage a war of assassins, insurgents, and shadow warriors against your cruel oppression.Who will stand with me?*watches the tumble weeds roll past Auctor on his soap box*I think you need to employ infra saving tactics buddy. Edited October 25, 2014 by The Pansy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted October 25, 2014 Report Share Posted October 25, 2014 The end of the Pansy Age draws near. I for one will be ready to rise up, and am ready to wage a war of assassins, insurgents, and shadow warriors against your cruel oppression.Who will stand with me? ..... *Looks around* ...... *goes to raise hand* *puts hand back down* ....... *looks around* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 *watches the tumble weeds roll past Auctor on his soap box*I think you need to employ infra saving tactics buddy.I've had enough of your bullying tactics. This ends now.Tonight, my agents will strike Pansy at server reset. Or they will melt into the shadows and await further orders. We really need a new code scheme that doesn't have the same codes for both of these orders in the codebook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pansy Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 I've had enough of your bullying tactics. This ends now.Tonight, my agents will strike Pansy at server reset. Or they will melt into the shadows and await further orders. We really need a new code scheme that doesn't have the same codes for both of these orders in the codebook.Do they have land, make sure they have land, I like land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Do they have land, make sure they have land, I like land. Crabs are ocean dwellers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illidan Stormrage Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Moving to Open World, this thread is almost in its entirety OOC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigrun Vapneir Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 It doesn't work because a small AA hitting a big one is absolutely suicidal in every imaginable way (unless said larger alliance is MI6) It wont work but that is not why, nor is it true. The intricacies of small vs large alliance warfare aside, there are still quite a few problems with the plan. A swarm of micros could certainly have the *potential* to cause some real chaos, but it's herding cats. There would have to be a strong shared motivation, such as to endure long enough, and those are quite rare. Plus the large alliances themselves will even put aside their mutual hatreds, temporarily, when the status quo is threatened. Anyone remember Walford? Hah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 It wont work but that is not why, nor is it true. The intricacies of small vs large alliance warfare aside, there are still quite a few problems with the plan. A swarm of micros could certainly have the *potential* to cause some real chaos, but it's herding cats. There would have to be a strong shared motivation, such as to endure long enough, and those are quite rare. Plus the large alliances themselves will even put aside their mutual hatreds, temporarily, when the status quo is threatened. Anyone remember Walford? Hah. Said string of micros would need a backbone as well as at least one or two major AAs backing them. Otherwise, all they could ever do is stir up shit in the lower tiers, which by itself, is a failing goal. But yes, I suppose a scenario like this is theoretically possible. But if it happened, it would only hurt the game, specifically the community as a whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingervites Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Micros hitting a large AA would be almost as bad as EQ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talkinsomesense Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 It would be next to impossible to get a group of small AA together large enough to make a difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saladjoe Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Micros hitting a large AA would be almost as bad as EQ. Any thread with this many foxfire posts automatically qualifies for the same level of ineptitude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Any thread with this many foxfire posts automatically qualifies for the same level of ineptitude. At least I'm literate.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingervites Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 At least I'm literate.... Are you saying Salajol is illiterate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Are you saying Salajol is illiterate? I would never imply such a rude and insensitive thing. :O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 So, i was thinking the other day about how boring CN is. Its just an endless cycle of build, fight, died, repeat for alliances. This lead me to think about what would make the game more interesting again. I came to the conclusion that what cyber nations needs in some chaos. By that i mean some kind of mass uprising of some sort. Like of a ton of small nations/alliances all attacked a big alliance. Or if civil wars broke out in a ton of major alliances. Or an off site force came and declared war on everyone. So basically my question is would you want something like this to happen? Also why hasn't anything like this ever happened before (and worked)? Before you guys hate on me I want to make it clear that I don't have any plans to do something like this. Cool story bro...I'm in let's do this! Will you lead our micro revolutionary forces in battle? :war: I can probably round up a couple of blood thirsty micros and if you can get The Pansy on board it's a cod lock We In This Brah! :awesome: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talkinsomesense Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 I think it would be interesting but i dont think it will ever happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackdog15 Posted October 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Cool story bro...I'm in let's do this! Will you lead our micro revolutionary forces in battle? :war: I can probably round up a couple of blood thirsty micros and if you can get The Pansy on board it's a cod lock We In This Brah! :awesome: As i said i have no intention of doing anything like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted October 26, 2014 Report Share Posted October 26, 2014 Holy !@#$! Another idiot with another grand plan about what CN needs!! I've heard this same !@#$ way too many times. I can only imagine how senior players who have.played consistently feel.... Wanna know why it hasn't happened before? Buckaroo13 and Tom Riddle are perfect examples. It doesn't work because a small AA hitting a big one is absolutely suicidal in every imaginable way (unless said larger alliance is MI6) Not to mention that small nations and large nations are equally dependent on each other. I hope that some day, people will stop regurgitating this same !@#$%^&* for everyone's sake. Relax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.