HDSupreme Posted July 27, 2014 Report Share Posted July 27, 2014 B-) Congratz to all the gentlewomen and gentlemen participants of such a good war ...! :laugh: :frantic: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John More Dread Posted July 31, 2014 Report Share Posted July 31, 2014 I dont even know where you get this stuff from? Just because you were #1 due to spending pretty much all your cash every day, does not make their first war an updeclare. The fact that it was an updeclare has nothing to do with my nation and everything to do with the fact that we were the #2 AA with more nukes and less NS and they were the #3 AA with less nukes and less NS. I could be equally pointlessly personal and say "just because you struggled with your own wars doesn't mean it was a downdeclare". I have noticed from DEFCON announcements that you seem to spend a great deal of time thinking about my nation and build/play style and how much it upsets you. You need to read some Epictetus, my friend. And to stop trolling me, it isn't benefitting you at all in any way, unless you derive some weird satisfaction from it, and as much as you seem to be interested in asserting yourself as some sort of nation building mentor, I already have a few people who present their advice in a much more useful manner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted July 31, 2014 Report Share Posted July 31, 2014 The fact that it was an updeclare has nothing to do with my nation and everything to do with the fact that we were the #2 AA with more nukes and less NS and they were the #3 AA with less nukes and less NS. I could be equally pointlessly personal and say "just because you struggled with your own wars doesn't mean it was a downdeclare". I have noticed from DEFCON announcements that you seem to spend a great deal of time thinking about my nation and build/play style and how much it upsets you. You need to read some Epictetus, my friend. And to stop trolling me, it isn't benefitting you at all in any way, unless you derive some weird satisfaction from it, and as much as you seem to be interested in asserting yourself as some sort of nation building mentor, I already have a few people who present their advice in a much more useful manner. Dude, you do not have a clue War Doves: Total NATIONS - 42Strength - 315,753Avg. NS - 7,518Infra - 67,748Tech - 7,664Nukes - 0DEFCON 1:TOTAL Nations - 48Strength - 314,573Avg. NS 6,554Infra - 66,093Tech - 8,990Nukes - 4 4 nukes on 1 nation. If I didnt jump their #1 guy who was on you, you would have been bashed to a pulp by the time they got MPs and nuked you. You had an SDI, and did not declare on ANY nuclear nations this round! You are gold, and you are lucky I was around to put up some resistance. Nobody even on War Doves side would say that this was an up declare. In fact it is the 1300+ tech difference, boosting Defcon1 NS to propagate this as a fair war. When you combine the fact that barely any of you, YOU ESPECIALLY know how to build and keep a warchest, then it really was an easy war for WD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John More Dread Posted August 2, 2014 Report Share Posted August 2, 2014 MMM, sure, yeah youre the big hero that came to save me after repeatedly and publicly trashing my nation on DEFCON forums. I thank you for your participation, as you should thank me for mine, but it would be a joke to credit you with my success. A truly hysterical one at that. With regards to a non nuclear AA declaring against a nuclear AA with 1300 more tech, a few MPs to none, and yes, the most powerful nation at the time, when they were within 1% strength AFTER building up for war of our strength BEFORE building, yes, it was a fair declaration even by the broken, Stalinistic definition of "fair" that passes around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.