Jump to content

Alliances Ranked by Nation Development.


Saxplayer

Recommended Posts

this ranking is looking at AVERAGE and CURRENT* level of development where development is based mostly on tech amount.

ranking low on this index does not mean your AA lacks an upper tier. it would mean your alliance is not only or mostly upper tier. it also would not mean your AA does not develop its nations. it would mean your AA has not yet developed its nations -- on average -- to the level of the AAs ahead of yours. this essentially does not reflect the rate at which an AA is currently developing (see below).

 

*CURRENT meaning it is static. some AAs ranking low here may be developing their younger, newer, or war-ravaged nations very efficiently -- in some cases, no doubt, more efficiently than some AAs ranking much higher. this index simply shows that they have not yet imported as much tech on average. to rank the development of AAs (again, defined here as tech acquired) over a period of time, one could take this same formula in a week or month or year and see the extent to which AAs' development has either progressed or regressed (ofc tracking actual development of an AA's nations requires taking an AA's nation gains and losses into consideration over the time period).

 

the formula is a bit arbitrary, but it is interesting nonetheless. it must be somewhat accurate because it places DBDC at the top. anyway, there's no reason to feel offended by nor get one's panties in a wad about this index. people should post more indexes. if you feel your AA is slighted, see how you can display information differently.

Edited by Superhero08
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alliance        Score     100k <         99k-70k

IRON            282        80 (22.72%) 28 (7.95%) 

Umbrella      148.5     47 (68.11%) 5 (7.24%

DT               142.5     42 (52.5%) 11 (13.75%)

TOP            132        34 (38.2%) 20 (22.47%)

NPO             111        23 (7.41%) 28 (9.03%)

NpO             105        24 (8.82%) 22 (8.08%)

ODN            100.5      21 (15.12%) 25 (18.11%)

Valhalla       100.5      23 (23%) 21 (21%)

GLoF           90          25 (31.25%) 10 (12.5%)

MHA             88.5       20 (15.74%) 19 (14.96%)

NEW            88.5        28 (33.33%) 3 (3.57%)

R&R             81           11 (5.64%) 32 (16.41%)

Fark             78          11 (9.46%) 30 (25.86%)

FAN              75          16 (18.18%) 18 (20.45%)

Sparta          73.5       14 (8.80%) 21 (13.07%)

NATO           72          17 (11.46%) 14 (9.58%

KoN             70.5        23 (39.65%) 1 (1.72%

MI6              69           15 (15.30%) 16 (16.32%)

VE               67.5        12 (8.51%) 21 (14.78%)

TPF             58.5        14 (20.58%) 11 (16.17%)

RIA              57           12 (19.67%) 14 (22.95%)

Non Grata   57            11 (10.47%) 16 (15.23%)

NADC          55.5         13 (13.82%) 11 (11.70%)

DBDC          54            18 (94.73%) 0

STA             51           12 (21.42%) 10 (17.85%)

FEAR          49.5         13 (35.13%) 7 (18.91%)

UPN            49.5         11 (16.92%) 11 (16.92%)

GOONS      48             6 (4.87% 20 (16.26%)

MCXA         46.5         10 (10.63%) 11 (11.07%)

GATO         46.5          8 (8.79%) 15 (16.48%)

DoD            45            11 (32.35%) 8 (23.52%)

GDA           45             11 (28.94%) 8 (21.05%)

TSK            45            11 (18.03%) 8 (13.11%)

LoSS          43.5          9 (8.01%) 11 (10%)

AB              43.5         12 (27.27%) 5 (11.36%)

TTK            42             6 (6.59%) 16 (17.58%)

WAPA         42             13 (46.4%) 2 (7.14%)

The Legion 40.5          7 (5.07%) 13 (9.42%)

TIO             40.5          8 (14.03%) 11 (19.29%)

CCC           39             7 (7.36%) 12 (12.63%)

Sengoku     39            10 (26.31%) 6 (15.78%)

CRAP          37.5         9 (17.64%) 7 (13.72%)

Wolfpack    36             10 (32.2%) 4 (12.9%

Ai                34.5          5 (7.57%) 13 (19.69%)

TSC            33             8 (22.22% 6 (16.66%)

TLR            31.5          3 (4.47%) 15 (22.38%)

TTE            31.5          7 (11.66%) 7 (11.66%)

OG              31.5         9 (60%) 3 (20%)

KotRT          30            8 (15.09%) 2 (3.77%)

SUN             30            7 (8.86%) 6 (7.59%)

SPTR           30            8 (33.33%) 4 (16.66%)

The Gramlins 30          10 (62.5%) 0

Invicta           27            4 (4.81%) 10 (12.04%)

The Int          27            4 (6.15%) 10 (15.38%)

GOP             27             8 (23.52%) 2 (5.88%)

tJL                25.5          8 (24.24%) 1 (3.03%)

Avalanche    25.5          5 (20.83%) 7 (29.16%)

AO                24             7 (38.88%) 2 (11.76%

Menotah       22.5          5 (25%) 5 (25%)

NSO             22.5          3 (3.29%) 9 (9.89%)

PPO             21            4 (19.04%) 6 (28.57%

MW              21            3 (5.55%) 8 (14.81%)

TSM            18             0              12 (52.17%)

Argent         16.5          4 (19.01%) 3 (14.28%)

DS               15             5 (17.24%) 0

NSF             15             4 (10.52%) 2 (5.26%)

AGW           15              3 (17.64%) 4 (23.52%)

GOD            13.5          1 (2.22%) 7 (15.55%)

Kaskus        13.5           2 (7.14%) 5 (17.85%)

NoR             12              2 (2.27%) 4 (4.54%)

SRA             9                2 (7.14%) 2 (7.14%)

Atlas            9                2 (3.33%) 2 (3.33%)

III%               7.5             2 (10%) 1 (5%)

USN             1.5              0           1 (2.12%)

Kashmir       1.5              0           1 (2.4%)

 

This was made to more fairly represent the number of developed nations in an alliance, for a better looking chart, go here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KfdoIG6W7-4HEk2O_bOScDxefu6BOtCjtyRLBis8K3E/edit

To make these stats, each 100k+ NS nation was worth 3 points, and each 99k-70k NS nation was worth 1.5 points. The percentages show what percentage of that alliance's membership fell into that catagory.

Edited by Saxplayer
Link to comment
Share on other sites


NADC          55.5         13 (13.82%) 11 (11.70%)

DBDC          54            18 (94.73%) 0

STA             51           12 (21.42%) 10 (17.85%)

FEAR          49.5         13 (35.13%) 7 (18.91%)

UPN            49.5         11 (16.92%) 11 (16.92%)

GOONS      48             6 (4.87% 20 (16.26%)



Maybe you should give extra points for having 200k+ nations or something. DBDC should never, ever be listed lower than NADC. xD

I do like how FEAR is above UPN & GOONS though, and just two below DBDC. :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Maybe you should give extra points for having 200k+ nations or something. DBDC should never, ever be listed lower than NADC. xD

I do like how FEAR is above UPN & GOONS though, and just two below DBDC. :D

Yeah, I considered that, I just don't know how to factor that in exactly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, you're factoring in land and militarization when you just go by raw NS, as well as infra heavy nations. At least use a real NS measurement (tech and infra only) plus adding up the amount of each respective military wonder and dividing that by the total # of nations. A nation with 100K NS but a <0.5 t/i ratio that's boosted by land/full militarization and doesn't have a WRC isn't worth half of what a nation with a t/i ratio approaching 1.0 with full military wonders. Not to mention the impact that warchests would have on this, but that's obviously not something you can just pull from a nation listing.

 

So something like ((total infra + total tech)/total nations) + ((total WRCs +total MPs + total SDIs + total Pentagons +total SLSs + total AADNs + total FAFBs +total HNMSs + total CIAs)/total nations) but that would take more work than just counting nations in certain NS rankings ;) You could even weight either the real NS or wonder "strength" categories if either one starts to be too large. Also the CIA thing would take looking at spy odds and some of those wonders might not even be worth factoring in like the air related ones or horrible mil wonders like FSS and IMS.

 

Edit: flipped <

Edited by Saladjoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nations with over 1k natural land growth should also slightly weaken your ranking imo.

Yeah, although 1k Land is only 1,500 NS, which, when you have a 100k NS nation, is little over 1%. 

 

Again, you're factoring in land and militarization when you just go by raw NS, as well as infra heavy nations. At least use a real NS measurement (tech and infra only) plus adding up the amount of each respective military wonder and dividing that by the total # of nations. A nation with 100K NS but a <0.5 t/i ratio that's boosted by land/full militarization and doesn't have a WRC isn't worth half of what a nation with a t/i ratio approaching 1.0 with full military wonders. Not to mention the impact that warchests would have on this, but that's obviously not something you can just pull from a nation listing.

 

So something like ((total infra + total tech)/total nations) + ((total WRCs +total MPs + total SDIs + total Pentagons +total SLSs + total AADNs + total FAFBs +total HNMSs + total CIAs)/total nations) but that would take more work than just counting nations in certain NS rankings ;) You could even weight either the real NS or wonder "strength" categories if either one starts to be too large. Also the CIA thing would take looking at spy odds and some of those wonders might not even be worth factoring in like the air related ones or horrible mil wonders like FSS and IMS.

 

Edit: flipped <

It's a good idea, I just don't have the time to count all that by hand, nor the coding abilities to write a program to do it for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...