Mogar Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 (edited) problem: all but 3 of the nations in CNRP are currently unable to build nuclear weapons due to the UN resolution, as such that is wasted statistics we are unable to transfer to IC. solution: add nukes to our military exchange we already passed. based on eva's suggestion: 20/30 Mt (1 nuke) =10 k soldier = 500 tanks = 10kt of shipping = 5 squadrons if you have a better suggestion for translation, feel free. Edited March 12, 2014 by Mogar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Rather than going with 10 MT, I'd go with 1 IG nuke or otherwise lower the amount of soldiers, tanks, etc. you get for 10 MT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserMelech Mikhail Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Since nukes can be whatever size you want them to be, I think IG nukes should be used for numbers rather than yield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evangeline Anovilis Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 20 Mt =10 k soldiers etc. Double the amount of nukes. This way, exchanging the whole load of your average 400 Mt arsenal earns you 200 k soldiers, or 200 kt of shipping, 10k tanks or 100 squads of aircraft. Since nukes can be whatever size you want them to be, I think IG nukes should be used for numbers rather than yield. We use yield, because you get 20 Mt of yield per IG nuke, thanks to rule change <_< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 I'd per IG nuke as a conversion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 edited to reflect you guys suggestions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 That math is wrong, if you base it on individual nukes it should be 30 MT (which is what 1 nuke actually is) =10k of soldiers with the reform of the nuke rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 eva just said 20 mt, but alright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evangeline Anovilis Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 It's 20 Mt base, 30 Mt for WRC nations, I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lkfht Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 I like this odea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Well keep it at one number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iKrolm Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 I like the 1 IG nuke suggestion too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MostGloriousLeader Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 While I like the idea I'm not sure how I feel about going with megatonnage versus just amount of ig nukes. If we go with that then someone with all the nuke multipliers could convert all of it into 750,000 soldiers which seems a bit extreme to me. With IG nukes it seems a bit less excessive at 250,000 men but on the other hand all the other conversions are based on after multipliers so I don't know. Personally I don't really care either way, just showing the pros and cons for each. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 I personally think the one IG nuke = the numbers listed is more balanced over having the multipliers added in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lkfht Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Yeah I support the 1IG nuke conversion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MostGloriousLeader Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 It seems most people are going for a 1IG nuke conversion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 Yeah I like the 1 ig nuke whatever conversion, simpler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolph Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 It's probably for the best to go with the 1G nuke conversion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 Instead of circle jerking each other make a poll lazy bums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evangeline Anovilis Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 I'm not a GM anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted March 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 I also am not a GM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 I am a GM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.