Saxplayer Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 (edited) In lieu of the current war, I decided to make a war map. And I do know that other people have already made their own, but I plan on updating this one daily. NSO and its allies are on the left, while NpO and its allies are on the right. Die Linke, RIA, and Shangri-La have been put on no definite side because of the disput over whether Kaskus's confilct is actually a part of this war. Edited November 9, 2013 by Saxplayer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 XX is only an MDoAP, not an MDAP, IIRC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 Lemme fix that, thanks for the correction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 I don't like the idea of putting treaty lines in, if only because it makes this a jumbled mess 200% faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 (edited) I don't like the idea of putting treaty lines in, if only because it makes this a jumbled mess 200% faster. Yeah good point there, How does this look? Edited November 5, 2013 by Saxplayer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 Didn't someone make a 3D treaty web program which could do this much easier? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 Yeah good point there, How does this look?Much cleaner. While yours was useful, most alliances cite the treaty used when declaring war. You could actually write that out in a table, if you wanted to waste more time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHAYD Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 Didn't someone make a 3D treaty web program which could do this much easier? I remember trying to draw a treaty web about two years ago. At least 5 treaties were changed and a bloc was dissolved before I was even 1/4 done with the map. I'm pretty sure it's throughly obsolete by now, if I can find it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Gross Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 Please update. Many DoWs in the last day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 If anybody knows any treaties that arent displayed on the map, please tell me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsayka Posted November 5, 2013 Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 You're missing TIO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 After Tonight, I'll reformat the entire map and make it neater. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoskia Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 After Tonight, I'll reformat the entire map and make it neater. Suggestion: Forget about the flags... just create squares or circles and paint all the circles (or squares) of one side with a color... and all the circles or squares of the other side with another.... and then write the names of the Alliances inside the circles or squares. The flags don't help to difference which one is the side that an Alliance is fighting for.... they simply make it very confusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 Suggestion: Forget about the flags... just create squares or circles and paint all the circles (or squares) of one side with a color... and all the circles or squares of the other side with another.... and then write the names of the Alliances inside the circles or squares. The flags don't help to difference which one is the side that an Alliance is fighting for.... they simply make it very confusing. Yeah that will probably be the new format Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walshington Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 On the other hand, I like the flags. If the arrows indicating wars were two different colors (Red for the SITH-o-SPHERE and blue for the POLARSHERE) I think that might do it and keep the falg look, which I like a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 Ignore the extra arrow next to NPO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Gross Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 Lacking in DoD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayan Thomas Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 (edited) . Edited June 19, 2019 by Rayan Thomas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Gross Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 NG hit top, you forgot to add the line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Lord Moth Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 I think now that Kashmir has declared on both TOP and Kaskus, that brings the Kaskus front over to the main side. ;>.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 Now someone just needs to attack R&R and Fark so we can be on all three sides at once Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walshington Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 Loving it, add the Kaskus-Sl front as well I think now that Kashmir has declared on both TOP and Kaskus, that brings the Kaskus front over to the main side. ;>.> Disagree. The CB is completely different and the war is completely unconnected, even if some of the same people are fighting in it. It is not a front, it is a completely different war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunzzz Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 Disagree. The CB is completely different and the war is completely unconnected, even if some of the same people are fighting in it. It is not a front, it is a completely different war.Im not sure if even Kaskus agrees with you there. Over at the GOONS consulate, they pretty much said we are on the same side of this war, atleast that's what that smurf guy implied there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walshington Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 Im not sure if even Kaskus agrees with you there. Over at the GOONS consulate, they pretty much said we are on the same side of this war, atleast that's what that smurf guy implied there He's wrong. I'm not sure why there would be any confusion. NpO hit NSO for attempting to hatch some plot against them. (rough paraphrase). Every other entry in that war is predicated on treaty relationships to those two powers. Meanwhile, Kaskus attacks SL for piling in on them in the last war. Everyone is entering based on their relationship to SL. There is zero connection between the causes and escalations of these two wars. It is almost the exact situation as the last Kaskus war: Kaskus and NSO go at over Unknown Smurf. EQ goes at it with Competence over... whatebver the hell it was, I can't remember. NPO was involved in both wars. But it was still two, distinct, unconnected wars and CB's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 In lieu of the current war That's not what "In lieu of" means, unless you're making the map instead of fighting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.