Walshington Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 gtfo .. The map is fine except for the small colour discrepancy. Yes, I overspoke there. The folly of having both wars on the same map -- still more than a color discrepancy, but my heyperbolic expression was ill-advised. Thanks for the correction, Rayvon, and apologies to the map maker. These are tough to do and I'm glad someone's doing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcrews Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Thanks for the work on the map guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarquista Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 map looks good, that go style Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manis B Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 update the op too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 following the statement from SL I'll align them with the NSO sphere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longshadow Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Looks sexy Andrew, good work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Slydell Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Clear. Clean. Simple. Informative. Synergistic. The guys in the boardrooms are eating this up, of that I am certain. Well done, AndrewHG. I for one am loving this graphic you've put together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 The question of Kaskus is simple: Are two wars the same war simply because they're happening at the same time? No. Kaskus declared their intention to nail someone a month ago, they picked their someone for their own reasons. It doesn't matter what SL thinks about it, reality is reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Cheers for that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 and the alliances with the most attention in terms of DOWs are: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emperordhruv Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Having variations of one color is really confusing. Sticking to two colors was easier to comprehend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Entirely understandable. But I am waiting for another link into the purples to involve them. This is the weighted map by strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 (edited) Make like a zoom in box on the smaller alliances Also, UCR needs to be added to that map Edited November 9, 2013 by Saxplayer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emperordhruv Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Dang Andrew you outdo yourself everytime. Thank you for this. Different ways to view this war and you provide a lot of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerridwyn Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Great Job. I like the variations too, makes it easy to see who/what is where Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarquista Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Make like a zoom in box on the smaller alliances Also, UCR needs to be added to that map it is in the box o smaller alliances :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 Anarchista is LSF in or out of the box then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxplayer Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 it is in the box o smaller alliances :) Oh I see it now, its just kinda Hard to see the U in UCR :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarquista Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 Anarchista is LSF in or out of the box then? what does the box represent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 outside the main war mate. Unless you advise whether LSF should be considered in the main war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarquista Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 it is two seperate wars, kaskus will surrender to our coalition of Shangri-la and allies, whereas i'm not sure which way the main war will go in favor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 I noted the MHA war on NOR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurnipCruncher Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 These are great, but that last one kind of makes TOP look the victim and her allies are countering. Far from true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewHG Posted November 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 DBDC attacking NOR & another triple on a small concern Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.