Jump to content

An Announcement by the Global Alliance and Treaty Organization


Recommended Posts


 

Libertarian Socialist Federation [LSF]

 

I do not believe we ourselves have a quarrel. I do not believe there exists a direct personal sense of animosity between our alliances. But you quarrel with our brothers in the International, and unfortunately, we do not look fondly upon that.

You forgot to say that you were one of the alliances who forced INT to throw them under the bus.
 

 

R&R
In the Dave War, the Global Alliance and Treaty Organization had the privilege of engaging R&R on the battlefield, under unfortunate and unnecessary circumstances. 

 

Unnecessary circumstances? LOL! I remember how GATO was happy to roll SF one more time. 


New Polar Order [NpO]
In the Bi-Polar War, our common allies in the Imperial Assault Alliance defended you. While we may have differed in opinion and clashed on ideas with you, we understood that they held you in high regard and we valued them for that loyalty and integrity. So when they rode to war, so did we.

 

You forgot to mention how you abandoned the battlefield and your allies in there after only ONE week of war.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry GATO, but you're very bad at trying to adulate people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

And then Invicta blows the stagger on Ebagger and gives him a second chance....Damn decent of you too.

 

At least we declared enough wars to be able to break a stagger  :smug:

 

But you're right, that was pretty dumb, and I'll be having words, you can count on that  :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry GATO, but you're very bad at trying to adulate people.

 

Just giving a list of reasons why we chose who we did. Process of elimination. Deal with it or cry more. Up to you. We're here. Eventually we will see all our forces out and fighting. We will get whatever it is coming to us I guess and that's that. We accept it. There really is no need for further bullshit. The time for all that has passed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just giving a list of reasons why we chose who we did. Process of elimination. Deal with it or cry more. Up to you. We're here. Eventually we will see all our forces out and fighting. We will get whatever it is coming to us I guess and that's that. We accept it. There really is no need for further bullshit. The time for all that has passed.

So, out of interest, why did you choose us? Because I'm not aware of any particular dislike for us, which would put us in the same boat as Avalanche? Or is it a strategy thing?  :awesome:

Edited by Ellis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just giving a list of reasons why we chose who we did. Process of elimination. Deal with it or cry more. Up to you. We're here. Eventually we will see all our forces out and fighting. We will get whatever it is coming to us I guess and that's that. We accept it. There really is no need for further bullshit. The time for all that has passed.

You need to look at your audience. You are using too much logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really is sad how the whole other side has abandoned strategy and tactics and obeying treaty ties. The future for this game looks bright.

 


Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just giving a list of reasons why we chose who we did. Process of elimination. Deal with it or cry more. Up to you. We're here. Eventually we will see all our forces out and fighting. We will get whatever it is coming to us I guess and that's that. We accept it. There really is no need for further bullshit. The time for all that has passed.

 

I hope this time your alliance fights for more than one week before abandon allies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really is sad how the whole other side has abandoned strategy and tactics and obeying treaty ties. The future for this game looks bright.

 


Funny how once you're on the receiving end you complain about precedents set by previous coalitions. Pre-empting and 3+ oA chains? Consider yourselves one-upped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, out of interest, why did you choose us? Because I'm not aware of any particular dislike for us, which would put us in the same boat as Avalanche? Or is it a strategy thing?  :awesome:

 

I think we were asked. I didn't really make the decisions. I looked at the list of possibles and said "Meh, I don't care just let me know who to target out."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, out of interest, why did you choose us? Because I'm not aware of any particular dislike for us, which would put us in the same boat as Avalanche? Or is it a strategy thing?  :awesome:

 

With so many options to choose from, we threw darts at our chart and blame Dre4m for his aim. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...