jraenar Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 So we kinda threw this together on short notice. Apologies for the extreme lack of lulz in the post, but tito was drunk, Stelios has like a job or something, and I was busy figuring out how to take on a Juggernaut. Rome hereby declares war on The Black Watch. We could not let this menace to Planet Steve continue unmolested. [size="1"]Oh, and we declare war on SUN too. Unfinished business and whatnot.[/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tevron Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Nice bit at the end there, I almost didn't catch it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernhard Klein Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 (edited) Nice one, guise Good luck! obligatory (but not entirely sarcastic) u madd? Edited April 22, 2012 by BKlein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerCruiser Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 lol If I'm not mistaken you guys have been complaining to other alliances about them doing down declares because of them having more nukes and higher ANS... If I'm not mistaken you guys have two times as many nukes as us and have a higher ANS . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingNeptune Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='KillerCruiser' timestamp='1335071907' post='2956992'] lol If I'm not mistaken you guys have been complaining to other alliances about them doing down declares because of them having more nukes and higher ANS... If I'm not mistaken you guys have two times as many nukes as us and have a higher ANS . [/quote] And your nations still in defcon5 and completely unprepared. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerCruiser Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='Kingneptune' timestamp='1335072087' post='2956994'] And your nations still in defcon5 and completely unprepared. Why? [/quote] same goes with your guys, and you declared on us ... lol the three I attacked all went strait to anarchy . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeros Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='KillerCruiser' timestamp='1335072515' post='2957000'] same goes with your guys, and you declared on us ... lol the three I attacked all went strait to anarchy . [/quote] Well....I usually don't comment here. But a quick check of our Alliance Status shows 0 nations in Anarchy right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerCruiser Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='Aeros' timestamp='1335073299' post='2957004'] Well....I usually don't comment here. But a quick check of our Alliance Status shows 0 nations in Anarchy right now. [/quote] lol, have you forgotten it won't update until around 2 Am. We have 5 in anarchy right now because that is what we started out with before the war. the stats don't update every second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeros Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='KillerCruiser' timestamp='1335073514' post='2957006'] lol, have you forgotten it won't update until around 2 Am. We have 5 in anarchy right now because that is what we started out with before the war. the stats don't update every second. [/quote] So they don't. Carry on then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted April 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='KillerCruiser' timestamp='1335071907' post='2956992'] lol If I'm not mistaken you guys have been complaining to other alliances about them doing down declares because of them having more nukes and higher ANS... If I'm not mistaken you guys have two times as many nukes as us and have a higher ANS . [/quote] ANS is only higher because you make a point of keeping hoards of low NS nations around to artificially lower your ANS. The tiers pre-update were fairly even. When you discard all the extra chaff, it's 7490 ANS for RE and 7004 ANS for SUN/BW. [code] 15k+ 10k+ 7k+ 5k+ SUN/BW 2 11 29 44 RE 0 12 32 48 [/code] We had other plans, but those fell through. This is what we came up with on short notice, and it's a pretty good match. Plus your tears from the last war were oh so delicious. We came for seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King James XVIII Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Best of luck in the war guys. Enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einer Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 It's hard to go too far wrong by having #2 try to kill #1 and take their place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADude Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='Einer' timestamp='1335075604' post='2957017'] It's hard to go too far wrong by having #2 try to kill #1 and take their place. [/quote] Roman Empire for #1 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vukland Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='KillerCruiser' timestamp='1335071907' post='2956992'] lol If I'm not mistaken you guys have been complaining to other alliances about them doing down declares because of them having more nukes and higher ANS... If I'm not mistaken you guys have two times as many nukes as us and have a higher ANS . [/quote] You know I was thinking the exact same thing[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reroll Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 so by RE logic, declaring on 1 large alliance allows you to declare on a much much much smaller one with impunity? I think that's pure bovine feces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scytale Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 *sigh* another alliance war on thethe black watch already? You're just doing everything to keep me nukes free aren't you? Oh very well, I don't mind a challenge. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADude Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='reroll' timestamp='1335094869' post='2957078'] so by RE logic, declaring on 1 large alliance allows you to declare on a much much much smaller one with impunity? I think that's pure bovine feces. [/quote] By TE logic really, its been this way since... Round 1 perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelios Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 (edited) [quote name='KillerCruiser' timestamp='1335072515' post='2957000'] same goes with your guys, and you declared on us ... lol the three I attacked all went strait to anarchy . [/quote] Considering you had 2999.99 infra.. you decide to attack a 15 day old nation.. with about 1299.99 infra... and no tech all that.. Of course you are going to get an anarchy when you take a troop dump. As being like the #1 SUN nation.. hitting the weakest you can then bragging about it.... Poor show sir... It will cost you Edit: 40 in anarchy Edited April 22, 2012 by Stelios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted April 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='scytale' timestamp='1335096656' post='2957094'] *sigh* another alliance war on thethe black watch already? You're just doing everything to keep me nukes free aren't you? Oh very well, I don't mind a challenge. :/ [/quote] Pretty sure Stelios just threw a dart at the alliance listings and picked one to reinforce SUN's soft creamy center a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul711 Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Good luck to both sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerCruiser Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 [quote name='Stelios' timestamp='1335101450' post='2957111'] Considering you had 2999.99 infra.. you decide to attack a 15 day old nation.. with about 1299.99 infra... and no tech all that.. Of course you are going to get an anarchy when you take a troop dump. As being like the #1 SUN nation.. hitting the weakest you can then bragging about it.... Poor show sir... It will cost you Edit: 40 in anarchy [/quote] you must be talking about this guy.. http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1001098 yes I attacked him, the reason is because I know him, and I want him to re-roll again . Also I'll be in 6 wars already, might as well have 1 easy target while being in 6 wars. for alliance ranking I wasn't number one I was ranked like 6th in the alliance we you guys attacked. Another thing you guys are doing the same thing as well, lol... for instance Thanatos is attacking m1c00l who is half his strength. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernhard Klein Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Long story made short: down declaring is evil unless you're the one doing it; anarchy doesn't mean anything unless you're the one causing it. Yada yada. Again, adminspeed to RE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadRash Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Have fun guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jraenar Posted April 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 You can call it a down-declare all you want. Does not make it one. The tiers overall were well-matched, and SUN had the advantage in the upper tier and far-low tier. This is about as close to even as you can get in TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerCruiser Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 [quote name='jraenar' timestamp='1335139663' post='2957424'] You can call it a down-declare all you want. Does not make it one. The tiers overall were well-matched, and SUN had the advantage in the upper tier and far-low tier. This is about as close to even as you can get in TE. [/quote] Well first off I never said it was a down declare, all I said is you guys complain to other alliances about them declaring on alliances with lower ANS and less nukes than the attacker, when the same thing is going on here You guys shouldn't be complaining to other alliances on who they attack, when from this war you guys have a higher ANS and almost double the amount of nukes. SUN: 52 nukes, RE: 101 nukes. That sounds awfully hypocritical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts