Jump to content

Allow Multiple Nations


Recommended Posts

Honestly, I've never seen this posted nor am I sure if it's even going to get more than a chuckle from admin/mods.

I've been playing since round 1. I've seen 3 month rounds, 2 month rounds, 5,000 to less than 1,000 players. I've participated in super alliances, led round winning flag runs and watched alliances rise and fall. I've been friends with my enemies and annihilated the first TE bloc. In that time TE has for the large part been the same thing with a new shiny trophy to be won at the end distracting players from treating it as a war simulation.

What do we have to lose by allowing multiple nations in TE? It just resets later, so nothing.

What do we have to win? More nations, more chaos, more strategy... I could go on for awhile.

Shake things up, make me actually decide to not quit next round. Rather than have one nation where when it gets roasted I'm done, give me the chance to defend one of my nations with another nation I control for double the fire power.

A few stipulations would need to be put into place, such as limiting the number to 6 nations (one trade ring?) or something. Preventing players from warring their own nations as slot filling, etc. But quite honestly, it's the only idea I've ever thought could bring back some fun to this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I think this is a good idea.

[quote name='lonewolfe2015' timestamp='1329443135' post='2922209']A few stipulations would need to be put into place, such as limiting the number to 6 nations (one trade ring?) or something.

Preventing players from warring their own nations as slot filling, etc[...][/quote]
Let's go simpler to start with, perhaps three nations. How about three nations - but the same ruler name for each of them? No hiding dammit, this is TE. It's like one ruler who has conquered three nations. That happens all the time in real life lol.

Agreed, yeah no slot filling or any kind, spy, war.

Other possible stuff:
Perhaps no trading together just to make it harder?
You can only be logged into one at a time.
Only one nation can place in the top three - whichever finishes highest?

It would certainly make the game more challenging. It would probably not only attract more players from SE, but probably from outside the game as well. Not every game will let you do this, but players of every game wish it would lol. So I'm in, let's dare to be different! Why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1331743914' post='2938013']
Agreed, yeah no slot filling or any kind, spy, war.

Other possible stuff:
Perhaps no trading together just to make it harder?
You can only be logged into one at a time.
Only one nation can place in the top three - whichever finishes highest?
[/quote]

Who cares about the trade rings now that we can switch our resources. Not that big a deal.

One big thing is that a single ruler (with multiple nations) could not declare on the same target. Forget about quad attacks when someone could triple-quad you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • 3 months later...

I like this idea too. Make the 5mill or more start up monies usable across the three nation or however many there were. Sorta inter nation fund transfers or foreign aid between your nations as it were. Then ya could have a war nations, a bank nation and a rogue hunting / tech raiding nation running simultaneously. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...