The difference is the rest of you follow the letter of the law, we the spirit. People are so concerned with justifying their actions through treaty links that we still have ghost decs so allies can get on their desired front.
The last 3 global wars have had different instigators and main targets, power is still quite diffuse whether your alliance chooses to take advantage of that or not. Would be nice if you guys could make up your minds whether DBDC is the omnipotent overlord or so far out of reach as to be irrelevant though.
What do you suppose we were told to do, and by whom?
There's hardly a hegemony in today's CN, and we're barely a part of the group to which you're attempting to apply that label, so you can jump down off that cross.
For us this had nothing to do with DBDC's reaction, it was all about yours.
Can't argue about the effects but for no reason in particular is a bit misleading, Polar were moving against NPO as well, they were just less overt about it.
if this is supposed to be some grand reveal you should probably screenshot instead of linking to something that most can't be bothered to make accounts for.
it wasn't a pun, and it wasn't funny. if you're going to use something like this to take a cheap shot at your perceived enemies at least give it some punch and real basis. that quote from the GGA member sums up their 4ish years of existence post GW1 perfectly. yours references one incident and a partner they've had for relatively little time. bravo