Jump to content

NoMercy

Members
  • Posts

    233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    United Destruction
  • Alliance Name
    The Sweet Oblivion
  • Resource 1
    Gems
  • Resource 2
    Coal

NoMercy's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. The world keeps turning. There will come a point in time, Pacifica/friends will be well respected all over and kick our asses, and while we'll hate it/them, they won't let us off the hook. But this isn't the time. This is the time to collect some hate in order to keep this planet turning. It's not that we haven't seen that before. Rinse and Repeat.
  2. You can't afford the arrogance. Seriously. Stop pretending you are anywhere near honorable.
  3. STA tears are delicious. You got your quick peace, you got your "emotional moments", what's the point?
  4. While I appreciate your work, I doubt you'll get a nobel price, because this is everything but surprising^^
  5. TIO joined, the war is lost, Bob is over. Honestly, You make it sound like anyone in TOP is mad about this DoW. The opposite is the case. How long will DDL last? Will he be able to unify his members? After his government left as a whole only a few weeks back? Can TIO stand the fire? It can if DDL is competent. Is he?
  6. Don't make it look like you don't have the man power to hit TOP. Why didn't RnR join the war, yet?
  7. tl;dr It turns out RnR is a joke. If I were Us, I'd disband right now.
  8. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/116019-this-week-in-gato/ Funny.
  9. Not all of CN this time? You are improving.
  10. Are creating them with an engine, or is this paint work? It would be impressive both ways, though
  11. No, not at all. Doesn't sound like it, pal. Drinking a cup of tea helps.
  12. No, I don't. IRON has shown in the past that they honored their treaties. They (according to you) were known for being a solid partner. For me, they'd still be one. I can't deny they didn't honor their treaty with NG, but they had a good reason for it (See iamthey). They chose friendship over paper, I can't blame them for that. In fact their decision was independent. They didn't follow the upcoming public pressure, but chose their friends instead. The only thing we can blame them for, is not canceling the treaty earlier. Then again, considering the communication between both parties, it could have been expected. That lightens the "guilt". I am sure people can understand this. That would have made the situation legally "acceptable". However it's not that when people cancel treaties prior a war, they don't know what the future coalitions will look like. So in both scenarios they'd have caused bad blood.
  13. You don't. As I said before, just because you repeat yourself again and again, you don't have a point. IRON had good reasons for staying out, and they have proven in the past that they usually honor treaties. Their only mistake was to cancel this one. Personally, I have talked to many people that don't give a damn. Now stop pretending you know what the world thinks.
  14. Which speaks for the claim of IRON that there hasn't been any communication between the two parties. Is it IRON's responsibility to knock on NG's door and offer assistance? Most MDP's are worded and understood the other way round. If you need assistance, you ask your allies for help. So it's NG's problem if they didn't knew IRON's position on the matter. If the plotting against the New Polar Order is considered an aggressive act, (that it was a defensive action can't be taken for granted), then it's IRON's right to choose whether to activate the optional Agression clause, or whether not to.
×
×
  • Create New...