Jump to content

Rocky Horror

Banned
  • Posts

    436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Picture Show
  • Alliance Name
    Historical Society
  • Resource 1
    Spices
  • Resource 2
    Uranium

Rocky Horror's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. [quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1326094561' post='2896211'] Did you [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nausea_%28novel%29"]do this[/url] on purpose? I clapped a little. [/quote]I was going to write it in French, initially. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1326095230' post='2896214'] I'm happy with it because most people assume my name is pronounced in a lame Bob English-based way, when French is one of the premier languages in Nausea. Though the post is off-base. [/quote]I pronounce it Rocketman.
  2. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1326074384' post='2896055'] That is the sentence (nevermind out of context, because your point is still without standing,) where I supposively "said", and then later I "implied," that I know Roquentin better than you. I really see where you're coming from. ...Bravo. [/quote]Oh sorry, you implied it rather than saying it outright, I'll walk home in shame now. Supposively.
  3. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1326073732' post='2896047'] I'm not distracting from anything. I'd ask you to show where I implied that fictional story you've made for yourself but I'm certain I'd get the same response as when I asked where I said it. Throwing around words like moralism might make you think you seem intelligent and are brandishing another fairy-tale foe as an ironic satan, or something, but you just look silly. You are right about one thing, this certainly is a stupid discussion. Wake me up when you graduate from spitting on your former friends and taking the hate OOC. [/quote]"I can only imagine what little had to be said for you and your ilk" There. I suppose the issue is beneath you by now though, have a good day scaling the unbelievable heights your life has clearly reached.
  4. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1326071979' post='2896035'] Find where I said that. Here, I'll save you some time: You won't. I said that I'm sure that what was said to bring on the despicable behavior of you and your ilk (which, in the way of debunking, you've done a marvelous job in the following pronouncements,) was not warranted. But continue with your M.O., I'm liking the direction its heading already. [/quote]Wow, if only I could be so detached and ironic..... You implied I don't know Roq any more than you do, I've known him for a long time and this is a stupid discussion. You can try and distract from that, wander down any rhetorical alleyway you like, but ultimately it comes down to moralising, and you're not even doing that well. For what it's worth, the dynamic within Umbrella seems to be lovely, if a little embarrassed on a minor issue about which they needn't worry. I'm sure Umbrella could enlighten you more, but I wouldn't be surprised if they had better things to do.
  5. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1326068382' post='2896001'] Yes, but I'm the real villain here. Anyway, I've given the logs I talked about to some concerned parties. They can choose to ignore it or not. [/quote]Are you confused? He said I have no idea about who you are, I said that's not exactly true. Crime of crimes!?
  6. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1326063185' post='2895917'] I can only imagine what little had to be said for you and your ilk to begin their IC slander and disgusting OOC attacks on someone they perceive as a threat and not too long ago worshiped as much as your beloved Archon. [/quote]I have known the nation leader Antoine Roquentin for well over four years and I am discussing his behaviour in this context. I still accept his achievements in internal affairs and CN knowledge (as much I mentioned) as much as I ever did, but he's talking nonsense.
  7. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1326059773' post='2895879'] If conversation has been anything like it has been here, I don't think he's the one whose head needs to cool. [/quote]Someone clearly has all the facts.
  8. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1326054731' post='2895842'] You're really playing with fire here if you are who I think. [/quote]You really need to mellow out.
  9. [quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' timestamp='1326050062' post='2895808'] Actually he probably feels more slighted about the fact that you [i]did[/i] actually try to sell him out to us and blame things on him which weren't his fault when he wasn't even around to defend himself. I get that Roq could probably do with calming down and really isn't doing himself any favours but these blatant attempts at character assasination are pretty shameful. [/quote]I don't even know what the first part is about. As to the second, I don't think Roquentin needs any help assassinating his own character.
  10. [quote name='Lusitan' timestamp='1326045422' post='2895771'] To be fair, regardless of the current situation, Roq was much better than Archon ever was in pretty much all the fields. Too good sometimes, he went to the extreme. [/quote]Sometimes that isn't a likable trait, like when it drives you insane and you undo everything you did with conspiracy theories and nonsense. Just as an example, hypothetic like.
  11. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1325761068' post='2893263']Well it's always been a one way relationship really. I can't think of a single thing they ever did for me, tbh and honestly, I'd never want to work with them ever again, which is why I am where I am now. The fact that they took the knives out and said a lot of things they didn't have the balls to say when I was around is bad enough in itself. The fact that they thought they could get away with it is even better.[/quote]I can barely believe this is a post from a member of umbrella who had access to military channels and is not(?) mentally ill. Assuming you are using the royal me to mean Umbrella, anyway, if not then your personality disorder is showing. The amount of childish, bragging nonsense that you and Natan threw at MK (who did all the fighting for our side while Umbrella did all the nationbuilding) meant that your alliance-mates had to throw you out. If it were up to me, the knives would've been out much earlier, but MK has a lot more respect for the members of Umbrella than that. Luckily, the members of Umbrella know a dried up old red cloud when they see one, and now we're free to ridicule your conspiracy theories if we need to. It's all very well feeling sorry for yourself, painting a vast canvas of injustice for yourself to critique. I'm sure you could list a thousand acronyms and their associated counters for every war since you joined us on this planet and before, in order to obfuscate the central point here: you didn't get the recognition you think you deserve. You aren't Archon, and you won't ever be perceived as an Archon. For all your efforts, you got no credit, and you're not going to get it by throwing your toys out of the pram and whining like you are in this thread. It's nauseating. Your existence is nauseating. Stop it.
  12. [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1325967931' post='2895017'] Excels at the diplomatic end of things...perhaps too well. Hard to gauge how good/bad MK is these days versus the incarnation that gave NPO a nuclear enema in the War of the Coalition (even as they took a pounding) or the version that fought in the Karma War. NPO is just the opposite--they were hard to gauge before Karma because they had elite/good fighting alliances surrounding them and their role focused more on logistics (aiding allied fighters) and coordination. It was later on that we got to see NPO in action in harder fights and they were exposed as being tech/military improvement/wonder light. [/quote]MK were never as good as I felt we should have been, but we were always better than anyone we fought. Our standards have also been higher than anyone we fought closely alongside, including one alliance in your top tier!! As to everyone I've ever fought against: 1. TOP 2. Avalon 3. NPO 4. TPF 5. IRON 6. NpO/MCXA 7. Rogues 8. NPL=CSN=TTK 9. GGA 10. MHA There is a huge gulf between #1 and #2, and between #2 and #2. #8 did more damage than #10, and I only fought them for 20 hours.
  13. [quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1325664157' post='2892181']A, your alliance has from its onset been hostile towards the Mostly Harmless Alliance.[/quote]From the point of view of an average member of MK over four and a half years, the average comment would level out at: "myth is a pretentious idiot, but the rest are OK or ghosts". Climb down.
  14. [quote name='total perspective vortex' timestamp='1325623862' post='2891627'] But have you really fought against MHA?[/quote]Yes. [quote]The declaration was about ghostbusting, and it seems many of you did exactly that.[/quote]Yep, we declared on any nation under your AA, and scores of them turned out to be ghosts. [quote]Therefore, you missed out on the fun, the real members were on the playground with ODN and allies.[/quote]But how would we tell the difference? [quote]It might be worth considering the possibility that you are forming an image of MHA based on a flawed research.[/quote]I'm in milcom - we had a pretty big sample size. [quote]Sure, we are not an incredible war machine.[/quote]This comment stands alone. [quote]But the accumulated damage done to the 11 vs our 5 shows that this wasn't the walkover some here like to believe it was. Yes, you won the war. Clearly.[/quote]It was exactly a walkover. I don't think any CnG alliance made it into the top 5 losses at any point, and the cutoff was pretty low most of the time. [quote]To improve your research, ask about the experiences of your members who were declared upon by MHA members.[/quote]This almost literally never happened.
  15. [quote name='Isaac MatthewII' timestamp='1324222082' post='2881169'] You are saints [/quote]Our love for the inhabitants of this game is greater than you shall ever know.
×
×
  • Create New...