ThatFALGuy

[quote name='Artigo' timestamp='1304535092' post='2706124'] These terms are not terrible how are we at 34 pages already? [/quote] Actually, I think the terms are BS in many regards. Welcome the new monster, same as the old monster.

After only reading the OP., all I can say is WTF? Are you !@#$@#$ serious? IS this thread fo' real? Who are you and what did you do with the leaders with the backbone?

Good to see peace, but reading the OP gave me a headache, anyone else get that effect too?

Could you please update Molon Labe from: Molon Labe (ML) - #molonlabe (Notice:irc://irc.esper.net/molonlabe) To: Molon Labe (ML) - #molonlabecn Now located exclusively on Coldfront.

[quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1297085337' post='2623951'] I have, actually.[/quote] I guess we can try this another way. Since you are voluntarily not involved, why not also voluntarily keep your nose out of it and thoughts to yourself?

[quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1297060316' post='2623654'] I'd love to be wrong. It's because ML is burning that I'm making these posts. I lay some of the blame on ML, of course, they still had to press the button, but they wouldn't have done so without tPF trying to bring them in. [/quote] Please give a little credit that ML isn't some mindless twit, nor is ML about ignoring its allies in need. Yes, ML pushed the button to help defend it's allies, though TPF did not and does not need to request ML's aid. None of ML's allies [i]need[/i] to [i]try[/i] to get help from ML. When help is needed it is "go time" and nothing less. I don't recall anywhere seeing "tPF trying to bring them in", in all actuality, you couldn't be more wrong. I have this sneaky suspicion it is not the choice that ML made in defending it's ally, but in who that ally is. Personally I find that rather sad, sad indeed.

[quote name='Xiphosis' timestamp='1297060555' post='2623671'] Glad to see Exodus was smart. How are you tonight my darling little failures? Who's a cute failure? You're a cute failure! Yes you are! [/quote] Wow, we hitting bottom here or what? I'd offer a hand back up, but I'd rather not need to shower again today.

Ahhhh... well that makes sense then. I am far from mad, giddy? Maybe... I get lazy after typing all that out and just capitalize as I go to stress a point rather than italicize or bold, I know, very lazy.

[quote name='Solaris' timestamp='1297005244' post='2622120'] Why are you so mad? [/quote] Why are you so obtuse?

WOOT!!! Good luck TPF!!! \o7 I take it this would be something like a recognition of notice of making known an acknowledgment of hostilities?

[quote name='Quinoa Rex' timestamp='1296929847' post='2620683'] It is not for you to decide whether or not our members are rogues, just like it's not for us to decide whether yours are. Your government member tried to inform us in the most deliberately obtuse of manners that it was just a rogue situation. We informed you otherwise and announced a recognition of hostilities purely to avoid confusion about who is actually at war with who.[/quote] So if I get this straight, it is NOT ok for ML to call a couple of your members rogues, a silly little word with virtually no meaning, but you can DICTATE to ML what it may and may not use as a definition for such a silly little word? I think this would be called a double standard, if our definitions match up of course [quote]Let me repeat that for anyone who didn't get it the first thousand times: [b][i][size="4"]it is an acknowledgement of hostilities that currently exist posted to avoid confusion about who is actually at war with who.[/size][/i][/b] The only thing I'm remotely upset about at this point is having to repeat that [i]ad nauseam[/i].[/quote] It's your own fault for having to repeat anything. Nobody else. It's your thread, amirite? knowutImsayin? It still befuddles me....lets toss the whole "rogue" thing to the side since a word of such nature carries no meaning anyway (to ML anyway, to a rogue it probably carries more merit and meaning or possibly shame, gotta be proud of heritage and all) and focus on the "need" for "acknowledgment" aspect of things.... or what I refer to as double standard part deux, AKA, the other issue people have with this pointless thread. MK and apparently Umbrella's policies dictate that a couple of wars, numbering 1-2 (from what I was told directly) do not warrant the need for a formal or even informal DoW.... fair enough, it's your policy of course, do as you see fit. Umbrella had two wars, MK had three, for 5 total wars. I am assuming that MK's "policy" must state something more like, 1-3 wars isn't enough to warrant "recognition of hostilities". I assume that, as that is the action that you portrayed (for the slow, it was Umbrella with 2 wars, MK with 3). ML had 3 total wars...... Do you see where I am going with this? SOOOOOooooo..... why not stop with the whole "ML dictated %^&*" "ML is poo-poo" "We are only mad at ML because they used our same tactics and we are still waiting on the patents office to return our call" and my favorite.. "How dare they call our members rogues!!! They can rape our land and pillage our women, but DO NOT. CALL. US. ROGUES!!!!"

[quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1296926626' post='2620606'] What does this have to do with my point or this thread? It's not like we were ignoring each other before this. We initiated war against TPF in response to their attack on GOONS. Then ML initiated war against us in response to our attack on TPF. Neither were declared wars. [b]ML tried to deny that their attacks on our members constituted an attack on us.[/b] [i]I don't know why this is so difficult for people to understand or follow.[/i] [/quote] Please point to where ML denied anything. I don't recall seeing anything denied. Did ML in any way state that it was not at war with you, that it did not expect retaliation for defending its allies? Big deal, ML labeled your first guys rogues, semantics really, but semantics for a reason. You drew ML into the conflict by attacking it through extension of its allies. I do remember when you, or it may have been Umbrella to be fair, were first asked, WTFBBQ are you doing, the reply was defending your allies. When ML was asked, WTFBBQ are you doing, the witty reply was, uh, the same thing. This was the content of the first conversation. Why anything matters beyond that, I have no idea except for drama factor. Continue to push and dictate to ML what can and can not be done or said, or defined for that matter and you WILL of course find some stubborn as $%&@, sons of !@#$%*es. I have this sneaking suspicion that the same would be, is and has been found within MK, so I can only assume you understand the sentiment. ML called your first guys rogues, everything else so far has been liquid brown !@#$%^&* though, even if it only amounts to mere semantics, a lie is a lie. The above bold, like the proverbial cake, is a lie. The italicized portion is moot as people are confused when things just don't add up. Why don't they add up? Because half of what is said is either A. a lie or B. conjecture and twist on something that means nothing to anyone but yourselves. It gives you a way to call ML the big ole meanie-stinky-head and nothing more. Of course people are confused. I still don't see the point of this thread at all. It's 24 pages of "ML mean, no like how ML call enemy rogue, must post on OWF" Remember, it is not ML which is making the stink about even the slightest thing. ML is happy enough to beat on some rogues and be done or to have MK and Umbrella back said rogues and play a little rockem sockem. Does it really matter that much to you that they are called rogues, does it really warrant all this?

Honestly, I don't understand why this thread is here. It's pointless and uncalled for as well as clutters up the OWF. /me shrugs

Duckmen or Duckaholics, either have a nice ring to them. Hi, I am FAL and I am a Duckaholic, so far I have 400 days of wet ass. -_o

[quote name='Shayne Rivai' timestamp='1296841331' post='2619377'] Oh, really? Thanks, bro. I was unaware that you were a member of Duckroll and not only that, but with government access. [/quote] You apparently are unaware. [i][b]I[/b][/i] am in fact the person that STATED in more than one way, ML has no desire to see DR take part in this, that DR is not warranted in any of this and that DR will not be called into any of this. ML is defending it's personal allies. This defending of personal allies has nothing to do with DR in any way, shape or form. IF DR comes in with force, it will be by other doings and not related to ML. Personally I just don't care for how it was originally put that ML "was told" they would not be backed, as if defending allies was a bad thing/choice or that defending its allies was based on if DR was ok with it, let alone, IIRC, by a non DR member. Did you question HIS information? [quote]Would you mind telling me when the next food drive starts?[/quote] No such thing as a food drive around here, get a gun and shoot something tasty. Being self reliant negates food drives. [quote]I wasn't at the last DR meeting and I really want to get rid of all this [i]BOLOGNA[/i] that you are dishing out -- I don't need it. [/quote] Venison bologna is very good, might do you some good to just eat a little of it for once, you're looking a little anemic. To all you haters out there just frothing at the mouth, baiting and taunting like little school children for DR to come rolling to town, jesus $%&@, would you quit already? It's very tiresome. You act like little school children playing some silly assed browser based game about politics and nations or something, grow up already. To all you lovers out there, I guess late is better than never and in the fashion of last years January/February war love fest, I announced that ML had turned 3, in the previous October. Well, it's that time of year again, ML turned 4, this previous October. Onwards to 5