Jump to content

dejarue

Members
  • Posts

    2,752
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    dejarue
  • Alliance Name
    Polaris
  • Resource 1
    Wine
  • Resource 2
    Sugar

Recent Profile Visitors

830 profile views

dejarue's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. Wow. History repeats itself... Reading things like this from NPO makes me really not want to be allied to them.
  2. I'm pretty sure this is a bug. In the new "Alliance Announcements" feature that came out today/yesterday, in the comments section, if you click on a nation that posts a comment, the nation id doesn't successfully get passed in the URL, resulting in a "no such nation" error.
  3. I'll do a 3/50. Unsure of the length of the arrangement, my alliance is setting up a ring. www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=494587
  4. The Paparazzi scored this photo of NPL once the clock struck midnight. [img]http://geektyrant.com/storage/post-images/BloodyJasonMomoaConan.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1278106256066[/img]
  5. I must say, I did enjoy the conduct of the guys I fought with.
  6. Meh, don't really get it, but whatever.
  7. [quote name='Laslo Kenez' timestamp='1340701464' post='2997053'] As if you've had the luxury, there were only two SF alliances that didn't get forced to fight anyway, and one entered before anyone else was in. So... well done GOD? [/quote] We have had the luxury. You know Superfriends have been around for like 4 years, right?
  8. [quote name='Tasuki' timestamp='1340697448' post='2997031'] Please hit NATO [/quote] If this sentiment is true, this war could interesting, fast.
  9. Anyone want to guess what bloc isn't attacking alliances who their allies are treatied to? I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with Shmuperfriends.
  10. lol At least you're true to your word. Your allies can do what they want, hit whoever they want, for whatever reason (or no reason) they want. And you will back anything. Because you have no humility. Yeah, we got it. No repercussions when people do something wrong. How dare they. I assume that if anyone hits NATO, there will be no backing from NPO.
  11. [quote name='zigbigadorlou' timestamp='1340640899' post='2995927'] Have you ever heard of "tech raid-PM for peace"? This isn't a tech raid by any means, but we thought it commonplace to have a friendly gesture of peace talks if desired. I'm surprised you've never heard of this! I'm guessing YOUR alliance is just rude. [/quote] Wha-huh? I thought the whole grounds for this was to see if SF would "defend" us. If your whole aim was to hit, and then quickly seek peace, how does this serve the ends of hitting and seeing if you could hit hard enough, for long enough, to invoke a defensive move by SF? Can you keep your story straight for even a day?
  12. [quote name='King Death II' timestamp='1340511451' post='2994153'] Oh hey GO, when do you guys plan on defending NPL? [/quote] Dude, the guys you brought in from Int to ghost your AA (when you couldn't pull off a real attack and ended up bent over a barrel within like an hour of declaring) couldn't even handle doing any damage WHILE QUADDING. Why would we want to bring our allies in? That'd be embarrassing.
  13. [quote name='Captain Spock' timestamp='1340476141' post='2993710'] Regardless of what the actual treaty text says, if LSF don't ask or want tR to defend LSF, why in the world should they feel obligated to defend LSF anyway? It just doesn't make sense. [/quote] That kind of explains what I've experienced (on the battlefield) in the last 14 hours.
  14. [quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1340432146' post='2993356'] Except at least Int can point to specific reasons why they stay out of the LSF affairs. You know oA LSF asked them to stay out all that good stuff. SF-XX stays out purely out of cowardice as far as I can tell. [/quote] It doesn't seem like you can tell very far... in general.
×
×
  • Create New...