Jump to content

Baldr

Members
  • Posts

    844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Breidablik
  • Resource 1
    Cattle
  • Resource 2
    Pigs

Recent Profile Visitors

555 profile views

Baldr's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. Despite all the talk, you still look just like the rest of DBDC to me. You spent your time there, you were a part of it, and you're no different from them. The fact that you have one war declared on DBDC, and three you've declared on SPATR doesn't help. /Trojan Horse, much?
  2. DBDC policy has always been "We'll do whatever we want, screw everyone else, if you don't like it, make us stop. Might makes right!" Now you're whining because someone did something you don't like. That's funny.
  3. I do not surrender to DBDC. I do not agree to any peace terms with DBDC. And I damn sure don't agree to any non-aggression pact with DBDC.
  4. You posted a joke surrender. You continued to fight, and we continued to fight. You are complaining that a fight you started didn't end the way you wanted. Quick and easy surrenders are exactly what tech raiders want. You get to hit, steal some tech, do some damage, and then the whole thing ends. But when you attacked me, it didn't go that way. I didn't kiss your butt, you were unable to anarchy me in your initial attacks, and I declared on three more of your nations and fought 6-1. Then you kept pushing with RIA and they decided that since you were going to keep hitting us anyway, they may as well go on the offensive. If you want peace with RIA, talk to Ogaden.
  5. He said what he said, and they did something different. I pointed it out, so you're cussing and calling me a dick. And you think that I'm the one who isn't civil. I'll let it go. From here out, cuss away. Be a dick, call me a dick, whatever you want to do. When I hit eventually hit GLOF, you know why.
  6. Right. It's my fault that he said one thing and then did another. lol
  7. Yes. He said "This is what we will be doing". Then they went and did something else, because they had no intention of doing the thing that he lied about. I understand. I don't mind. I'll enjoy the war.
  8. "As is, we're holding back, limiting oursleves to a target list of those RIA nations who have directly attacked our allies in Aurora Borealis." That's a lie. It's not true. And yes, he meant to deceive people., He wanted people to think that they were only attacking RIA nations who attacked AB. That's why he said it. As it stood, I had already been nuked by DBDC. I can't declare while in anarchy, so there wasn't any chance at all I was going to declare war on any nation at all, until after my war ended and I cleared nuclear anarchy. RIA has been attacking AB for a week or so, yet I never bothered. Now, suddenly, after I didn't bother during that time, and after I've been nuked, suddenly I'm a threat? Nonsense.
  9. You claim I'm still "launching offensive wars", but I've started a total of one war in the past several months, so that clearly isn't true. The wars that I have launched since I left IRON has been against DBDC, and that's a direct result of them attacking me. They started a fight, and since I never begged for their forgiveness and I don't have the juice to destroy them myself, we're at war. This GLOF attack may drag me into the global war, but I wasn't involved in it before. Penedono claimed that they were only attacking RIA nations who had hit AB. He lied. I don't think I've ever, ever hit AB. I certainly haven't in the past four months since I joined RIA. I figure they are attacking me because they want to kiss up to DBDC. There is nothing wrong with that. I'm not complaining about the attacks, just the lies about how only nations hitting AB are going to be targeted.
  10. You are lying. I have not been involved with AB, but you have two nations attacking me. I'm not complaining, just pointing out that your words and your actions don't match.
  11. So far, they haven't even stopped attacking, so that "surrender" talk looks a bit weak. Not to mention, Cuba pretending that "exposed spy operations" was the only issue here. Also, keep in mind that "lets just stop this now" is exactly what raiders want. They asked to stop minutes after they completed their first quad attacks. Raiders don't want real wars, they want to take your tech, land, money, do some damage, then everyone agrees to peace. I could have taken that option. Just let them have whatever they had taken and let them walk off with their spoils of war. But it just encourages them, and they would almost certainly hit me again sometime down the road. Kipling wrote a poem about it, roughly 1,000 years ago. . . It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation To call upon a neighbour and to say: -- "We invaded you last night--we are quite prepared to fight, Unless you pay us cash to go away." And that is called asking for Dane-geld, And the people who ask it explain That you've only to pay 'em the Dane-geld And then you'll get rid of the Dane! It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation, To puff and look important and to say: -- "Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you. We will therefore pay you cash to go away." And that is called paying the Dane-geld; But we've proved it again and again, That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld You never get rid of the Dane. It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation, For fear they should succumb and go astray; So when you are requested to pay up or be molested, You will find it better policy to say: -- "We never pay any-one Dane-geld, No matter how trifling the cost; For the end of that game is oppression and shame, And the nation that pays it is lost!"
  12. Back in the day, this was a great tool. Would be nice to see an update.
  13. I'm pretty sure NPO would be happy to end the war. The ones that don't want to end the war are the ones on the other side, demanding unreasonable terms for doing the exact same thing that they've been doing. Those are also the ones claiming "Polar coalition has a great deal of ideological unity unlike Equilibrium." I'm in IRON. Technically, I'm on "that side". And like many others on that side, I recognize that the only reason that the war continues is because *some* people want to give a bunch of BS terms to NPO.
  14. As Caliph argues about how NPO deserves harsh terms because a decade or so ago, they gave out some harsh terms, I thought "I wonder what happened the last time NPO fought agaisnt Umbrella". Technically, I was just double checking. I was already pretty sure it was white peace. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=116057 Sure enough, white peace, no terms, no penalties. Umbrella said "We lost", and that was it.
×
×
  • Create New...