Jump to content

Lord Emares

Members
  • Posts

    469
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Lord Emares

  • Birthday 02/19/1985

Profile Information

  • Location
    Ireland
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    New Spring
  • Resource 1
    Marble
  • Resource 2
    Water

Lord Emares's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. [quote name='Lenny N Karl' timestamp='1323127904' post='2864538'] Good luck to you and IA if she is still around there [/quote] she is
  2. War, sweet sweet war. How I have missed thee.
  3. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1295956705' post='2599906']Note: The way Archon, speaking for himself, uses the pronoun "I" while Roq, speaking for Doomhouse, uses "we."[/quote] Archon as the sovereign of MK has it within his power to use MK to further his own interests, more specifically "actively wanting to see BAPS burn". However you are saying that the precedent set by Doomhouse, in attacking NPO "because we want to see them burn", isn't cause for wondering whether or not BAPS will be hit by MK in a preemptive strike in this "brave new world". Since BAPS is in Duckroll and Doomhouse is a chaining MDoAP why should we not draw conclusions of Duckroll potentially "being next" from the precedents set here?
  4. I don't condone what Peggy did, and think it was a pretty awful and childish thing to do. A more apt analogy is "someone" leaving their car in "another"'s driveway rent free. "another" then tells "someone" get your damn car out of my driveway, you have a month. "someone" then proceeds to be hostile towards "another" in their dealings and "another" decides screw this your car is getting it's ass towed today. UPN should have had the presence of mind to move the forums within days of being told "you have a month". The majority of the fault for the forums being defaced lies with Peggy, however some lies with UPN for deciding not to find a host sooner.
  5. I worked it out a few days ago but could only confirm it today -66,-111 is the 100% spot however to actually get 100% you need to input this lat: -66.00000001 lon: -111 The reason for the .00000001 is to take account of floating point errors (someone worked out all of the latitudes that are affected by the floating point errors in the Moon Hotspot thread).
  6. Should be at: Lat: -67 Lon: -111
  7. [quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' date='19 July 2010 - 03:56 PM' timestamp='1279551384' post='2378832'] What do BAPS have to do with ANYTHING? Your logic is seriously flawed, because we bailed on BAPS(don't quote me on that, I cannot be bothered to history right now) we're not allowed to comment on an alliance taking a new FA direction and how stupidly they're going about doing it? What? [/quote] Didn't say you couldn't. Was just pointing out the hypocrisy of Quinoa Rex on his high horse when he said "I guarantee that had MK done such a thing" referring to the (in his view) objectionable nature of cancelling on allies who went to bat for you. Sure criticise away, I don't really give two beans whether or not you criticise people, but if you are going to criticise don't do it in a "hurf durf we're better than you" way when your alliance has done precisely the same thing in the past. so tl;dr I wasn't attacking the message, but the delivery of said message. Now back to your regularly scheduled criticisms please.
  8. [quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' date='19 July 2010 - 02:07 PM' timestamp='1279544839' post='2378773'] Good observation. Less treaties = more good, although you could've just been patient and cancelled them all one at a time over a certain time period. But this is IRON we're talking about here. [/quote] I guess sarcasm doesn't translate well over the intertubes. Read up on your own history, particularly the bit about how you bailed on BAPS when it was at the wrong end of a beatdown. (also I'm not in IRON )
  9. [quote name='Quinoa Rex' date='19 July 2010 - 12:39 AM' timestamp='1279496360' post='2377919'] I don't think you could have missed the point any more if you tried. It's not about making multiple posts, and it's clear a lot of the alliances who were cancelled on don't view IRON as a friend. The meat of the matter is thus: cancelling on your allies en masse has [i]never[/i] been an acceptable move. I [i]guarantee[/i] that had MK done such a thing (not that we ever would), you would be skinning us alive. I'm disappointed that anyone is trying to make it out to be fine and dandy. I mean, hell, I hold no love for any of the alliances IRON cancelled on, and I [i]still[/i] think it was a rotten thing to do. Blah, blah, realpolitik, whatever. Bailing on your friends will gain you no respect when push comes to shove. [/quote] Because MK has never bailed on any allies ever.
  10. [quote name='Emperor Marx' date='12 February 2010 - 12:41 PM' timestamp='1265978508' post='2177459'] Perhaps you should instruct Lord Emares on how to properly win a ground assault before making such childish claims. [/quote] That would have been a miscalculation of how many soldiers you had deployed...I thought you had a lot less than you had, so I'd only deployed enough to deal with that. Mistakes happen *shrugs*
  11. More lamenting the fact that you would send in a 4k infra nation with no SDI and a warchest like that against a nation with a WRC, MP and SDI and nearly 1.5k more infra than said attacker... Nation in question: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=267681 Nation attacked: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=197861 Nations @ 4k infra with Warchests like that should be spending time in Peace Mode getting their WC built up.
  12. [quote name='Starfox101' date='11 February 2010 - 10:53 AM' timestamp='1265885597' post='2174473'] Personally, I wouldn't call a veteran alliance with 600 nukes a soft target, but hey, whatever floats your boat and makes you sleep better at night. You'll just wake up to a nuclear attack and a surprise from your "soft targets". [/quote] Well when the "veterans" you send in have warchests like this: [quote]Total Money: $16,815,132[/quote] ...
×
×
  • Create New...