• Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.
  • entries
    12
  • comments
    167
  • views
    12,270

Hoo's NFL Draft Preview: Quarterbacks

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Van Hoo III

1,226 views

To be honest, this year's crop of quarterbacks is pretty underwhelming. There isn't a stand alone slam dunk signal caller that is going to make teams salivate. What you do have is a lot of "maybe", "could be", and "has the potential to be" than you usually see in the first few rounds of a draft. In fact, there isn't a whole lot of separation from #1 to #7 on my list and I moved several of them up and down numerous times before settling on an order. No sir, there is no Sam Bradford in the 2011 NFL Draft.

Note: These rankings are not the order in which I think they will be drafted. Also: the commentary gets much shorter the further down the list I get ...

Legend:

+ = on the rise

- = on the decline

Z = Sleeper

1. Blaine Gabbert, Missouri - It is difficult to put Gabbert at the top of the heap, but I do so by default. He has all the tools and certainly looks the part, but as someone who watched every game of his MU career I was shocked that he decided to come out. Sure, financially it is obviously the right choice since he is probably going in the ten or five. But, with the holes in his game he probably should have stayed one more year.

At 6'5" 235, he has perfect QB size. He doesn't have a cannon, but his arm is strong and he can make all the throws. On top of that, Gabbert is surprisingly athletic and can run if he needs to. He reminds me of Aaron Rodgers in that regard. A guy that you don't think has wheels, but then pops off a 30 yard scamper.

Where Gabbert struggles the most is consistency. He is one of the streakiest college QBs that I have possibly ever seen. He will have three amazing series that you watch in awe, but then his next two will make you wonder how he ever won a starting QB job. When Gabbert is off, he is WAY off.

Having said that, his flaws are correctable and Gabbert is extremely coachable. Any other year and he'd be a mid to late round prospect and a solid sleeper. But in 2011, with no Andrew Luck, he is the best QB in this class.

2. Ryan Mallett, Arkansas (-) - Dan Marino's arm ... Ryan Leaf's maturity. If it weren't for the off the field issues and the lack of leadership, Mallett would be that slam dunk that I said this draft was missing.

Mallett has a flipping howitzer for an arm, can put the ball anywhere, and played in a pro style offense while at Arkansas. Sadly, he ran a 5.75 40 time and I think that even I might be able to beat that. In today's NFL with complex blitz schemes and ultra quick pass rushers, a QB this slow might not have any success in the league.

However, Mallett does have a super quick release on that cannon of his and seems to make his reads quickly. That will help since his feet are encased in concrete.

The lack of speed and athleticism isn't what keeps Mallett from being a top 10 pick though. What is holding him back are the rumors of drug use, problems with alcohol, and an attitude that makes it difficult for others to follow him on the football field. These issues will cause Mallett to fall to the end of the first at the earliest, and possibly into the late second round.

3. Cam Newton, Auburn - Physically Newton is the perfect QB. He has Brett Favre's arm, Micheal Vick's feet, and Ben Roethlisberger's size.

Why is he #3 on my list? Because he opened his mouth.

You see, Newton has already proclaimed himself to be an "entertainer" and an "icon" and that didn't rub future coaches and players the right way. It is great to have confidence, but in the NFL you have to pay your dues. Newton has pretty much anointed himself a superstar without playing a single down. Historically, when it comes to the NFL Draft, that signals trouble ... especially when there were already questions about Newton's character and work ethic.

Compounding things is the fact that Newton played in a very vanilla offense at Auburn. It was not complex and Newton was not asked to make many actual decisions. That won't fly in the NFL. In fact, when Newton was interviewed by John Gruden last week, he seemed confused by simple questions and football jargon.

However, the sky is the limit for Newton. He is a specimen and an absolute freak. If he can get his head together and submit to proper coaching, he could be something special. That alone will get him drafted in the top five, and perhaps #1 overall.

4. Andy Dalton, TCU (Z) - This is bold of me to say, but Dalton could potentially end up with the best career in this draft class. He doesn't have Mallett's arm, Newton's athleticism, or Gabbert's ideal frame ... but he is intelligent, a winner, and does all the little things correctly.

Two things hold Dalton back. First is his frame - 6'2", 213. That is ultra thin and sometimes it looks like a defender will be able to snap him in two. Second is the fact that you can't plop Dalton into any offense and expect results. Sure, he will give it his all and try to will you to victory ... but Dalton will really only be successful in a West Coast style offense. Short dropbacks, quick reads, and timing patterns ... those things will make Dalton a great starter one day. If a coaching staff gets too cute and tries to rely on a vertical passing attack with him, they will potentially ruin him.

5. Colin Kaepernick, Nevada (Z) - Kaepernick put up gawdy numbers in his career at Nevada, but the level of competition wasn't the greatest. He also seems to be a run first QB, and that is a problem. On the plus side, he is a good kid who will strive to be great. He reminds me of Vince Young, but without the mental issues.

6. Jake Locker, Washington (-) - Like Gabbert, Locker looks like he was born to play QB. He has the perfect size, has an NFL arm, and can take off and run if he needs to. Unfortunately, he is probably the most inaccurate college QB I have seen in some time. The combine, Senior Bowl and his Pro Day did nothing to erase those concerns either. His raw talent will get him drafted in the early 2nd at the latest, and in the mid 1st at the earliest.

7. Christian Ponder, Florida State (+) - Ponder looks the part when he drops back and he stands in the pocket well. He is accurate on short passes, but does tend to sail the deep ball. He doesn't throw a lot of picks, yet doesn't read a defense all that well ... which is just downright odd. This inability to adjust to what the defense is doing hurts his draft stock. Throw in injury concerns and Ponder is a late first rounder at best ... with bust potential.

8. Ricky Stanzi, Iowa (-) - Extremely inaccurate in college, but damn it if he doesn't look good doing it. Stanzi is tall with great mechanics and delivery ... this will get him drafted as a developmental prospect, but I wouldn't expect too much.

9. Pat Devlin, Delaware - Future caretaker backup and spot starter right here. Went to the same college as Joe Flacco, but that is where the comparison ends. Devlin has solid size, but a weak arm and isn't athletic at all running just under 5.0 in the 40 at the combine. Having said that, he absorbs a playbook well and is exceptionally smart. He'll have a career in the league as long as there aren't any expectations.

10. T.J. Yates, North Carolina - Similar to Dalton, but lacks the prototypical size. He has the intangibles, but lacks the tangibles to be a starter in the NFL.

11. Greg McElroy, Alabama (-) - McElroy scored a near perfect on the Wonderlic and will probably make a solid coach one day. He will have a difficult time making an NFL roster though. He was a winner in college, but he doesn't have the talent to last.

12. Nathan Enderle, Idaho (Z) - At 6'5" 245, Enderle will get some love in the draft. He doesn't have ideal arm strength, but could end up being a decent game manager. But he won't make it far if he can't cut down on the picks.

13. Tyrod Taylor, Virginia Tech - Taylor will be a gimmick player in the NFL. Think Brad Smith.

14. Adam Weber, Minnesota (Z) - If Weber threw less interceptions for a struggling Minnesota program, he'd be considered a third round prospect. As it stands, he'll be a free agent pick up (once FAs are able to be signed) who could work his way onto a roster as a backup and future starter. His arm strength is decent and he has great mechanics, but he is a tad on the short side ... listed as 6'1", but I have read that that is being generous.

15. Scott Tolzien, Wisconsin - Probably won't get drafted, but could have a future as a clipboard holder.


Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0


19 Comments


If the Titans draft Mallet, I'm done. I think we can get Ponder in the 2nd round. Maybe Devlin later.

Share this comment


Link to comment

You know, I find it perplexing that you like both sports and Star Wars.

lol

If the Titans draft Mallet, I'm done. I think we can get Ponder in the 2nd round. Maybe Devlin later.

To be honest, Devlin seems to match Munchak's philosophy. He won't light the world on fire, but he'll make very few mistakes.

Share this comment


Link to comment

You know, I find it perplexing that you like both sports and Star Wars.

Hoo isn't the only one. <_<

Any thoughts on who the Eagles draft Hoo?

Share this comment


Link to comment

Hoo isn't the only one. <_<

Any thoughts on who the Eagles draft Hoo?

Best O-lineman available or a CB.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Redskins needs a QB but after Gabbert and Newton, no one is worth their 10th pick. If those two are gone, I hope they trade down, get additional pick and draft a QB later down the draft.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Redskins needs a QB but after Gabbert and Newton, no one is worth their 10th pick. If those two are gone, I hope they trade down, get additional pick and draft a QB later down the draft.

If I were Washington, I'd trade back to land a QB. Shanahan likes mobile QBs though, and I could see them reaching for Locker at #10.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Redskins needs a QB but after Gabbert and Newton, no one is worth their 10th pick. If those two are gone, I hope they trade down, get additional pick and draft a QB later down the draft.
If I were Washington, I'd trade back to land a QB. Shanahan likes mobile QBs though, and I could see them reaching for Locker at #10.

Locker in later draft is fine not worth the 10th pick though. If the Redskins decides to keep the pick I like defensive end Robert Quinn. He has big potential to be a dominant player. Doubt he will still be available by the 10th pick though. They can go with offensive lineman Mike Pouncey. A bit high for the pick but I think he is going to be a solid player for a long long time.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Redskins needs a QB but after Gabbert and Newton, no one is worth their 10th pick. If those two are gone, I hope they trade down, get additional pick and draft a QB later down the draft.
If I were Washington, I'd trade back to land a QB. Shanahan likes mobile QBs though, and I could see them reaching for Locker at #10.
Locker in later draft is fine not worth the 10th pick though. If the Redskins decides to keep the pick I like defensive end Robert Quinn. He has big potential to be a dominant player. Doubt he will still be available by the 10th pick though. They can go with offensive lineman Mike Pouncey. A bit high for the pick but I think he is going to be a solid player for a long long time.

Oh I agree that he isn't worth the #10 pick. It isn't about who I would pick though, it is about who I think the 'Skins will pick. :P

I think that Quinn is a better 4-3 DE than a 3-4 OLB. He might be a better natural pass rusher than Bowers even, but you're right ... he should be gone by #10. I think Pouncey is solid, but a little overrated. I think a lot of people think of his brother and assume he is just as good.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Hoo, what do you think about the possibility of Cam Newton to the Bengals?

Doubtful. I think they have had their fill of diva-like players and he doesn't really fit what they want to do on offense. New offensive coordinator Jay Gruden is installing the West Coast offense. Gabbert, Ponder, or Dalton are better fits and the latter two might still be there when Cincy picks in the 2nd.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Cam Newton is undeniably talented, but is a gamble none-the-less.

Cam Newton has a style of play not unlike that of Michael Vick or Vince Young, but as every player is, different.

With the opening of his mouth, he might transform into an off the field type player of Terrell Owens or Chad Ochocinco (or whatever name he goes by now.)

Somebody will take a shot on him, and either it will work out or it won't. Its probably a 50/50 shot that it does to it doesn't, if it doesn't work out, there will be somebody who spent a pick they could have used on a long-term franchise player on little more then a whim and a prayer. If it does work out, there will be those who are sorry they passed up the oppertunity.

But at any rate, over the past few years, I'm becoming increasingly a believer that the style of ball that Cam Newton plays isn't a very successful one in the NFL. Michael Vick and Vince Young both have passing games that are barely better then poor - Career wise, Vick averages 150 passing yards per game in the games he's played, Young averages 149, and their running games haven't seemed to make the transition from college to pros, Vick averages 48 per game, Young averages 26 per game.

Off the field issues aside, is the style of game that Cam Newton can be used for, and will probably use, going to produce better results then the style of game that Blaine Gabbert is going to play? Time will tell. I wouldn't use a top 5 pick on Newton because I think its too much of a risk, not only the off the field issues, but also concerns on how effective his skills will be in the NFL compared to college.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Peter King seemed to really believe Cam Newton would go the Panthers and I honestly think they are stupid enough to do it. The Bengals will probably go with AJ Green to shore up receiver and could pick a solid QB in a later round (or trade Palmer for someone later :P).

Share this comment


Link to comment

Hope Mallet is still on the board when the Dolphins pick, but I find this unlikely. Not much a fan of the other QBs in the draft this year.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now