YOLO SWAG Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 (edited) Kashmiri Co-Prosperity Kashmir, holding to the school of thought that global politics needs much less entanglement in the way of absolute treaties, knowing full well, and understanding that global politics is a place of conflicting moral obligations and conflicting treaty obligations-- acknowledges that in this world of chaos there are those among us who would stake their right to defend and assist as they please. Understanding that public policy toward all aspects of cybernation politics changes daily, Kashmir submits that alliances are bound only by true feelings of friendship and co-prosperity. It is with this submission that Kashmir accepts co-prosperity as the only means necessary to legally aid and assist, in aggressive or defensive, diplomatic, economic, or military tasks-- if so determined by the governance of Kashmir. Kashmiri co-prosperity is defined by her government and those foreign parties who have accepted the principles of Kashmiri co-prosperity. Kashmiri co-prosperity consist conceptually as an agreement to the principles of non-aggression, optional defense and optional aggression. Each alliance privy to Kashmir’s co-prosperity sphere is an independent signatory and the relationship between various signatories shall be considered independent of one another and a separate accord altogether. Kashmiri co-prosperity does not imply friendship between signatories but does promote non aggression. Edited May 18, 2013 by YOLO SWAG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Holton Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 [center][/center] The New Sith Order is proud to be the first member of the Kashmiri Co-Prosperity Sphere. The Strong will Survive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Kashmir and NSO ascend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KainIIIC Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 despite his general awfulness, what Holton says is true. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Damn Straight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 <Holton[NSO]> http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/116732-when-all-are-one-and-one-is-all-to-be-a-rock-and-not-to-roll/ <Holton[NSO]> go hail our awesomeness And so it was done. o/ Kashmir o/ NSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvon Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Oh hey ... My forged signature :facepalm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Congrats, just remember that NSO doesn't fight global wars anymore. :> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 So this is a version of Moldavi Doctrine plus a NAP mixed with DoN format where just one side need to sign it. In your desperation for originality you created a monster who still is unoriginal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvon Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Officially: [b]For the New Sith Order:[/b] [b]Rayvon[/b] [i]Emperor[/i] [b]Dilber[/b] [i]Dark Lord[/i] [b]KirstenMichelle[/b] [i]Sith Lord[/i] [center][/center] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOLO SWAG Posted May 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 (edited) D34th, no. D34th, pls. Edited May 18, 2013 by YOLO SWAG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordShinnra Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 ewwww promoting non-aggression. -10 points from Kashmir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Actually D34th, neither side needs to sign anything (although Rayvon obliged you). There's nothing to sign after all. I sense the synapses aren't firing, I'll help. It's a public affirmation of a private agreement. Think of it as a compromise between a formal treaty and a paperless arrangement. Should you require a label to wrap your mind around that however YOLO actually spelled it out in the second sentence of the third paragraph. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordShinnra Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 I'm told this isn't a DoN or promoting non-aggression in general. Therefore, my stamp of approval is uhmm... stamped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Actually D34th, neither side needs to sign anything (although Rayvon obliged you). There's nothing to sign after all. Not my fault if the document speak about signatories: Each alliance privy to Kashmir’s co-prosperity sphere is an independent signatory and the relationship between various signatories shall be considered independent of one another and a separate accord altogether. Kashmiri co-prosperity does not imply friendship between signatories but does promote non aggression. I sense the synapses aren't firing, I'll help. It's a public affirmation of a private agreement. Think of it as a compromise between a formal treaty and a paperless arrangement. Should you require a label to wrap your mind around that however YOLO actually spelled it out in the second sentence of the third paragraph. If it has signatories, it's because a document exists to be signed, if a document exist it is formal. So there is no middle term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOLO SWAG Posted May 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 (edited) It's great when outside parties try to interpret things for the parties actually involved. It's a good measurement of having way too much time on your hands. Edited May 18, 2013 by YOLO SWAG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 You caught the misnomer. I'm sure YOLO isn't losing any sleep over it. I'll go ahead and cut you off after "If it has signatories" and direct you to my previous post. You're wrong. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 @YOLO SWAG a good measurement of having way too much time on your hands is also waste your time measuring the free time other people have. Nice to know that both of us has a lot of free time. @SirWilliam By saying I'm wrong you're saying that your document is wrong, so I'm ok with that. Next time pay more attention to the words that you use not conflict with the objectives of your "paperless document". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 (edited) @SirWilliam By saying I'm wrong you're saying that your document is wrong, so I'm ok with that. This makes literally no sense. :wacko: edit: Reading comprehension, dear friend. There is no document. Next time pay more attention to the words that you use not conflict with the objectives of your "paperless document". Ok, next time I'll be sure to pay more attention to the words I use, those being my words and all that you took issue with. :rolleyes: Nice graphic. Your job was to stumble in, latch on to the last paragraph, and bow out once you realized you were wrong (but not before trying to save face with an asinine premise)? Good, good on you. Edited May 18, 2013 by SirWilliam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayan Thomas Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 (edited) . Edited June 19, 2019 by Rayan Thomas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 If there aren't any signatories, what the fuck are you doing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 Livin' the dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordShinnra Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 If there aren't any signatories, what the fuck are you doing? Gentlemen's agreement imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilber Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 If there aren't any signatories, what the fuck are you doing?Whatever we want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted May 18, 2013 Report Share Posted May 18, 2013 d3456th is onto us. show's over boys let's go home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.